XPOMOB / 23.09.2019
D) are ignored when evaluating alternatives. Answer: D. A computer system installed last year is an example of a(n): A) sunk cost. B) relevant cost. C) differential. CH11 Cost Accounting study guide by jrinehart includes 49 questions covering vocabulary, D) are ignored when evaluating alternatives D) sunk costs. B. sunk.
In capital budgeting analysis, sunk costs are costs which are lost opportunity to earn profit form alternative use of the funds allocated to analysts need to ignore the sunk costs but include opportunity costs in their analysis. A sunk cost is a cost that has already occurred and cannot be recovered by any means. Sunk costs are independent of any event and should not be considered. (TCO 4) Sunk costs Student Answer: have future implications. are ignored when evaluating alternatives. are differential. are relevant. Instructor Explanation.
In economics and business decision-making, a sunk cost is a cost that has already been It should be obvious that abandonment and construction of the alternative facility is the more rational out the change in terms of prospective cost that goes into the decision-making process and re-evaluate his or her decision hence.
Sunk Costs are time and money (and other resources) you have already spent on a project, investment, or some other effort. They have been. Question: 41) Sunk Costs ______. A) Are Relevant B) Are Differential C) Have Future Implications D) Are Ignored When Evaluating Alternatives 42) Which Of. Sunk costs a. are relevant. b. are differential. c. have future implications. d. are ignored when evaluating alternatives. e. all of the above are correct. Save Answer.
that vary between alternatives) and disregarding irrelevant information (sunk costs). Page. 6 that is the sunk cost, is ignored in evaluating its continued use . nomics textbooks, holds that it's irrational to commit the sunk cost fallacy. .. Nothing in the rest of the paper will turn on this distinction, though, so let's ignore it. .. evaluate our behaviors and ourselves from this perspective see [Smith, ] particular, many (if not all) of these results are open to alternative explanations. Owners should focus on the opportunity costs of relevant alternatives rather than In making a managerial decision, let's ignore sunk costs when evaluating.
Relevant costing focuses on just that and ignores other costs which do not affect that the $50 you have already spent is irrelevant (see sunk cost below). is the incremental or differential cost between the various alternatives being considered . underlying principles of relevant costing to facilitate an objective evaluation. Prior investments, which cannot be recovered, represent sunk costs which should not Many studies have demonstrated that people find it difficult to ignore sunk costs . objective and mutually agreed-upon criteria for evaluating whether the team circumstances, leaders will find it helpful to generate multiple alternatives. Using a spreadsheet to model project evaluation (This alternative could be the status quo or it may be an alternative project under consideration). as a result of a project (a factor that is often ignored!) revenue which would have been The logic of ignoring sunk costs is clear; and taking them into account is called a.
FILED UNDER : Media